The Kansas House has advanced a bill that some say will make it harder for cities, counties and school districts to curb the consumption of junk food. More from Heartland Health Monitor’s Jim McLean.
The bill prohibits local leaders from implementing policies that restrict the sale of junk food or require restaurants and other food retailers to provide consumers with more nutritional information.
Supporters of the bill say it’s needed to create a level playing field for businesses and to block extreme policies like former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s attempt to regulate the size of sugary drinks.
But opponents like Representative John Wilson, a Lawrence Democrat, say it will hinder efforts in cities, counties and school districts to implement healthy food policies aimed at curbing the state’s rising obesity rate, which at 31 percent is the 13th highest in the nation.
“This bill, I think, would be harmful to hundreds of innovative and evidence-based programs and initiatives designed to improve the health of Kansans, but especially children and teens.”
Wilson said a comprehensive approach to obesity is necessary because the environments in which we live and work can either make it “easy, hard or impossible” to eat healthier.
–
Kansas House Advances Bill To Block Health Food Regulations
By Jim McLean
The Kansas House on Thursday tentatively approved a bill to prohibit city, county and school district officials from adopting certain types of health food policies.
The bill — House Bill 2595 —would prevent local officials from restricting the sale of non-nutritious drinks and food at restaurants, grocery stores and other retailers. It also would preclude policies that require business to provide consumers with more nutritional information about the food they sell.
The bill is scheduled for final action Friday.
The Kansas measure mirrors model legislation developed by the American Legislative Exchange Council, a controversial organization that works with corporate executives and state lawmakers to develop business-friendly policies.
The bill is being pushed by Republicans seeking to build a firewall in Kansas against policies being implemented in other areas of the country to restrict the sale or require more extensive labeling of high-calorie foods and drinks. Supporters want to head off any effort to use zoning and licensing laws to limit where fast food restaurants can locate.
Supporters say Kansas needs a statewide policy to create a predictable environment for businesses.
“What we’re looking for is consistency and uniformity,” said Rep. Gene Suellentrop, a Wichita Republican and ALEC member.
But opponents charge the bill is a solution in search of a problem. They say cities and counties aren’t contemplating the kind of policies it’s designed to block. And they fear it will disrupt more modest local efforts to promote healthy eating and curb the state’s rising obesity rate, which at 31.3 percent ranks as the nation’s 13th highest.
“This bill would, I think, be harmful to hundreds of innovative and evidence-based programs and initiatives designed to improve the health of Kansans, especially children and teens,” said Rep. John Wilson, a Lawrence Democrat who works for a nonprofit organization focused on reducing childhood obesity.
Wilson said he fears the bill will have “a chilling effect” on efforts under way in Lawrence and Douglas County to create a healthy food environment. He said communities should be free to pursue such comprehensive approaches because the environments in which people live and work can “make it easy, hard or impossible to make healthy choices.”
Ashley Jones-Wisner, a lobbyist for KC Healthy Kids, http://ift.tt/21Eb4jh a nonprofit advocacy organization, said she is concerned the bill will hinder collaborative efforts to increase access to healthy foods in the Kansas City metropolitan area.
“The problem with this bill is that the language is incredibly broad,” Jones-Wisner said. “There could be a lot of unintended consequences.”
Jones-Wisner is particularly concerned about language in the bill that prohibits cities and counties from using permitting and licensing policies to address “food-based health disparities.”
“This bill could effectively tie the hands of local governments trying to retain local grocery stores in rural areas,” she said. “It could also potentially harm the work that we’re doing in urban areas to try and attract grocery stores and increase food access in low-income (urban) areas.”
During a committee hearing on the bill, Jason Watkins, a lobbyist for the Kansas Restaurant and Hospitality Association, said advocates needn’t be so concerned.
“Nothing in this bill says that a nonprofit can’t do education about lifestyle choices with their members,” Watkins said.
Still, Rep. Erin Davis, an Olathe Republican, was uncertain whether the bill would allow school districts and local health departments to continue nutrition education programs. So she offered an amendment to ensure that programs teaching children that “an apple is a more healthy choice than a (Hostess) Ho Ho” wouldn’t be affected.
Opponents applauded the amendment, which passed on a voice vote, but said they remained concern the bill could prohibit the ability of school districts to limit the availability of non-nutritious items in vending machines.
Jim McLean is executive editor of KHI News Service in Topeka, a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor team.
No comments:
Post a Comment